#### Abraham Madenberg, Defendant in Error, v. Solomon Ritman and L. Feldman, Plaintiffs in Error.

Gen. No. 20,070.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the' Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry M. Fisher, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed December 22, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Abraham Madenberg against Solomon Ritman and L. Feldman, a partnership, for forty-five dollars claimed to be a balance due on account of wages. A judgment being rendered in favor of the plaintiff, defendants brought error.

Samuel Micon, for plaintiffs in error.

Victor L. Huszagh, for defendant in error.

*186Abstract of the Decision.

1. Appeal and error, § 968 * —when record is insufficient. On appeal from a judgment for a balance due on account of wages, the statement of facts is insufficient when it does not show all the evidence before the trial court, the record showing evidence of a book of entries which are not contained in the statement of facts.

2. Appeal and error, § 1772*—when judgment mil he reversed. A judgment of the trial court will not be reversed, unless it is contrary to the law and the evidence, or unless the judgment resulted from errors in the trial court directly affecting matters in issue between the parties.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.