{
  "id": 2898891,
  "name": "John D. Casey, Administrator, Appellee, v. Chicago Railways Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Casey v. Chicago Railways Co.",
  "decision_date": "1914-12-21",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,987",
  "first_page": "56",
  "last_page": "56",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 Ill. App. 56"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 161,
    "char_count": 1557,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.51,
    "sha256": "ee7ab936ee241757b43b8bbedabe165e24f5941869e7b8d15f20816353b1eee7",
    "simhash": "1:48e98001c01da091",
    "word_count": 261
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:39:36.956740+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John D. Casey, Administrator, Appellee, v. Chicago Railways Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles L. Mahony and Frank L. Kriete, for appellant; W. W. Gurley and John R. Guilliams, of counsel.",
      "Cruice & Langille, for appellee; Daniel L. Cruice, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John D. Casey, Administrator, Appellee, v. Chicago Railways Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 19,987.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nSteeet bailboads, \u00a7 132 -\u2014what are questions for fury in action for injuries. In an action for the death of an eight-year-old boy, the question whether, if the motorman of defendant\u2019s street car had been operating his car with reasonable care and caution, he would have seen the decedent, on or so near the track as to be in danger of being struck by the car, in time to stop the car and avoid injuring him, and the questions whether the decedent was in the exercise of ordinary care, and whether the decedent\u2019s parents exercised care for his safety, were questions of fact upon which the verdict of the jury was conclusive.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Jorra P. McGoobty, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 21, 1914.\nStatement of the, Case.\nAction by John D. Casey as administrator of Solomon Morris against the Chicago Railways Company for wrongfully causing the death of plaintiff\u2019s intestate, a boy eight years and eleven months of age. From a judgment for the plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nCharles L. Mahony and Frank L. Kriete, for appellant; W. W. Gurley and John R. Guilliams, of counsel.\nCruice & Langille, for appellee; Daniel L. Cruice, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI- to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0056-01",
  "first_page_order": 78,
  "last_page_order": 78
}