{
  "id": 2901110,
  "name": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. John Niesdesmialek, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of Chicago v. Niesdesmialek",
  "decision_date": "1914-12-22",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,045",
  "first_page": "109",
  "last_page": "109",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 Ill. App. 109"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1240,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.54,
    "sha256": "5ad6d9dc59fc4de31393f4c66f1cd30f70038393c36499212d676cb7e0b97f32",
    "simhash": "1:8151fca4718fe074",
    "word_count": 207
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:39:36.956740+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. John Niesdesmialek, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. S. Lakey, for plaintiff in error.",
      "William H. Sexton and James S. McInerney, for defendant in error; Albert J. W. Appell, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. John Niesdesmialek, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,045.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nMunicipal Court of Chicago, % 26 \u2014insufficiency of statement of facts. A \u201cstatement of facts\u201d consisting of a mere narrative of witnesses\u2019 testimony, or its substance, will be stricken from the record upon motion, since such a document does not meet the requirement of the Municipal Court Act, \u00a7 23; If 6, (Hurd\u2019s R. S. 1913, ch. 37, \u00a7 286, J. & A. T 3335), and assignments of error based entirely upon such a document cannot be considered on appeal.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. David Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 22, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by the City of Chicago against John Niesdesmialek. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff defendant brings error.\nA. S. Lakey, for plaintiff in error.\nWilliam H. Sexton and James S. McInerney, for defendant in error; Albert J. W. Appell, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0109-01",
  "first_page_order": 131,
  "last_page_order": 131
}