{
  "id": 2900855,
  "name": "William E. Mason, Executor, Appellee, v. Susan Kobliska et al., on appeal of James H. Hooper and Ona A. Hooper, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mason v. Kobliska",
  "decision_date": "1914-12-22",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,970",
  "first_page": "178",
  "last_page": "179",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 Ill. App. 178"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 181,
    "char_count": 1947,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.59,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.380125665320789e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3928312036724921
    },
    "sha256": "e917d4b6492cf6dc47e4ea099a4e0c9d5d63bc852040af8b9bc0bc2180edb9dd",
    "simhash": "1:3571432c780d82fc",
    "word_count": 330
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:39:36.956740+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William E. Mason, Executor, Appellee, v. Susan Kobliska et al., on appeal of James H. Hooper and Ona A. Hooper, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Smith\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Mortgages, \u00a7 394*\u2014what is sufficient election to declare whole-debt due. The determination of a holder of notes to file a bill for the foreclosure of a trust deed for the entire indebtedness, and the preparation and filing of such bill, is a sufficient election to declare the whole sum due, and to entitle him to maintain the bill.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Smith"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "James H. Hooper, pro se.",
      "A. G. Dicus, for appellant Ona A. Hooper.",
      "Charles E. Pope, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William E. Mason, Executor, Appellee, v. Susan Kobliska et al., on appeal of James H. Hooper and Ona A. Hooper, Appellants.\nGen. No. 19,970.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 943 \u2014when party cannot object to recp/rd. On appeal from a foreclosure decree, a contention that no-' evidence is contained in the record showing a tax sale or deed/on the mortgaged property, warranting foreclosure cannot be sustained where it appears that the appellee was not afforded an opportunity to supply such defect, and where a transcript of additional parts of the record was filed subsequent to the filing of briefs showing the tax sale.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John Gibbons, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 22, 1914.\nRehearing denied January 5, 1915.\nStatement of tlie Case.\nBill for foreclosure by William E. Mason, executor, against Susan Kobliska and others, alleging as a ground for declaring the whole indebtedness due that taxes legally levied were not paid and that the premises were sold for said taxes, and that there had been no redemption from the sale. The usual form of a foreclosure decree was entered upon a master\u2019s report recommending such decree, and James H. Hooper and Ona A. Hooper appealed.\nJames H. Hooper, pro se.\nA. G. Dicus, for appellant Ona A. Hooper.\nCharles E. Pope, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vois. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly,' same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0178-01",
  "first_page_order": 200,
  "last_page_order": 201
}