{
  "id": 2902864,
  "name": "Joseph Dux v. Marion D. Rumsey et al.; James A. Miller. & Brother, Appellants, v. Marion D. Rumsey et al., Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dux v. Rumsey",
  "decision_date": "1914-10-13",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 5,928",
  "first_page": "237",
  "last_page": "238",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 Ill. App. 237"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 91,
    "char_count": 850,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.524,
    "sha256": "4a018fd0d41a7b8720d1cf8f54953a2cbb4799e6f0b75abf2963b8896d3fba31",
    "simhash": "1:fa135d57f828fa91",
    "word_count": 141
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:39:36.956740+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Joseph Dux v. Marion D. Rumsey et al. James A. Miller. & Brother, Appellants, v. Marion D. Rumsey et al., Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dibell\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dibell"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Whitney, J., took no part in this decision.",
      "Silber, Isaacs, Silber & Woley, for appellants; James D. Woley, of counsel.",
      "Sheriff, Dent, Dobyns & Freeman and Sam S. Holmes, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Joseph Dux v. Marion D. Rumsey et al. James A. Miller. & Brother, Appellants, v. Marion D. Rumsey et al., Appellees.\nGen. No. 5,928.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Lake county; the Hon. Charles Whitney, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 13, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nThis case is substantially the same as Dux v. Rumsey, ante, p. 234. Appellants were subcontractors and filed an amended answer in the nature of a cross-bill in the same proceeding. The decision filed in the above mentioned case held controlling.\nWhitney, J., took no part in this decision.\nSilber, Isaacs, Silber & Woley, for appellants; James D. Woley, of counsel.\nSheriff, Dent, Dobyns & Freeman and Sam S. Holmes, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0237-01",
  "first_page_order": 259,
  "last_page_order": 260
}