{
  "id": 2902498,
  "name": "Shandrow & Kern, Appellees, v. Rust, Swift & Company, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Shandrow & Kern v. Rust, Swift & Co.",
  "decision_date": "1914-10-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "431",
  "last_page": "432",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 Ill. App. 431"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1508,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.479,
    "sha256": "adab2bce4576780acf72af4e602afe81ee2227e8661d0043c48e4a2b1878bc4a",
    "simhash": "1:c2c44ea29ef79236",
    "word_count": 249
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:39:36.956740+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Shandrow & Kern, Appellees, v. Rust, Swift & Company, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Eldredge\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Eldredge"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John J. Brenholt, for appellants.",
      "Charles J. Macauley and T. J. Selby, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Shandrow & Kern, Appellees, v. Rust, Swift & Company, Appellants.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court o\u00ed Calhoun county; the Hon. Harry Higbee, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 16, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Shandrow & Kern, as partners, against Bust, Swift & Company, partners, to recover an account for goods sold. The action was originally brought before a justice of the peace, and on an appeal to the Circuit Court the trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs and judgment was entered thereon. From this judgment, defendant appeals.\nThe only question involved is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to establish that the goods were sold to defendants, or to another.\nEvidence for plaintiffs tended to show that the contract was that of defendants and their contention was supported by the testimony of the third person. Defendants\u2019 evidence tended to show that they had no connection with the contract, but that it was the contract of such third person.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nContracts, \u00a7 389*\u2014toben execution a question for jury. Evidence as to whether contract tor purchase of goods was made by defendants or by a third person, examined and held that question was for the jury and that a verdict was not manifestly against the weight, of evidence.\nJohn J. Brenholt, for appellants.\nCharles J. Macauley and T. J. Selby, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0431-01",
  "first_page_order": 453,
  "last_page_order": 454
}