{
  "id": 2904702,
  "name": "F. B. Sherfy, Appellant, v. W. A. lachenmyer, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sherfy v. Lachenmyer",
  "decision_date": "1914-10-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "443",
  "last_page": "443",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "190 Ill. App. 443"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 137,
    "char_count": 1456,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.524,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.770845263994211e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4121759608378712
    },
    "sha256": "0efbdf762f7e4a06949d1273f92b31b21b39bf01c5d463749883d3875eedadcb",
    "simhash": "1:a5dd8b25dc6dc228",
    "word_count": 253
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:39:36.956740+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "F. B. Sherfy, Appellant, v. W. A. lachenmyer, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Eldredge\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Eldredge"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Walter B. Riley and Fred B. Hamill, for appellant.",
      "Green & Palmer and Acton & Acton, for appellee; Oris Barth, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "F. B. Sherfy, Appellant, v. W. A. lachenmyer, Appellee.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nGaming, \u00a7 18 \u2014when renewal note in hands of innocent purchaser void.. A renewal note is void, though in the hands of an innocent purchaser, where the consideration of the first note was a gambling debt.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Champaign county; the Hon. Solon Philbkick, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 16, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by F. B. Sherfy against W. A. Lachenmyer on a promissory note executed by plaintiff to his own order and indorsed on the back by him.\nDefendant executed a note payable to one Matheny in payment of money lost to the latter in gambling at cards in a gambling room run by the latter. The note came into the hands of the First National Bank for collection. Defendant informed the cashier of the bank that he was unable to pay the note at that time, that it was for money lost at gambling, and executed in renewal thereof the note on which this action brought. The court directed a verdict for defendant and from the judgment thereon, plaintiff appeals.\nWalter B. Riley and Fred B. Hamill, for appellant.\nGreen & Palmer and Acton & Acton, for appellee; Oris Barth, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0443-01",
  "first_page_order": 465,
  "last_page_order": 465
}