{
  "id": 5384106,
  "name": "Benjamin Wolf, Plaintiff in Error, v. Elizabeth Gloor, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wolf v. Gloor",
  "decision_date": "1914-12-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,050",
  "first_page": "62",
  "last_page": "63",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "191 Ill. App. 62"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1478,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.53,
    "sha256": "3b2e51a46a328bd7a7ebaf566089b3300ec294cfe9734e0bbc67274953b6ce57",
    "simhash": "1:c3764dc35238e09c",
    "word_count": 241
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:18:11.463405+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Benjamin Wolf, Plaintiff in Error, v. Elizabeth Gloor, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Pam\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Pam"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George A. McCorkle and Benjamin Wolf, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Anderson, Anderson & Anderson, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Benjamin Wolf, Plaintiff in Error, v. Elizabeth Gloor, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 20,050.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph Sabath, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 31, 1914.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Benjamin Wolf against Elizabeth G-loor to recover a balance alleged to be due for legal services rendered and expenses incurred in securing the appointment of defendant as guardian of her grandchild, Catherine Gloor. A trial was had before the court and a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of defendant. To reverse a judgment entered tin the verdict, plaintiff prosecutes a writ of error..\nGeorge A. McCorkle and Benjamin Wolf, for plaintiff in error.\nAnderson, Anderson & Anderson, for defendant in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAttorney and client, \u00a7 135 \u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain verdict. In an action by an attorney for a balance due for legal services and expenses incurred in securing the appointment of defendant as guardian of her grandchild, where evidence was introduced as- to the value of the services and there was evidence to show that defendant had paid plaintiff five hundred dollars, held that a verdict for defendant was sustained by the evidence.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vola. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0062-01",
  "first_page_order": 106,
  "last_page_order": 107
}