{
  "id": 5380841,
  "name": "S. F. Svenson and Harold M. Swensen, Defendants in Error, v. Lucy Roth and Paulina Hockstadter, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Svenson v. Roth",
  "decision_date": "1915-01-25",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 18,566",
  "first_page": "123",
  "last_page": "123",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "191 Ill. App. 123"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1356,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.557,
    "sha256": "22c7a6ef6e2a2e74f416aef61a96b2ef3849b77c020ad9e965b161092dd93650",
    "simhash": "1:4b5bc2a3101d88a4",
    "word_count": 224
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:18:11.463405+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "S. F. Svenson and Harold M. Swensen, Defendants in Error, v. Lucy Roth and Paulina Hockstadter, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Brown\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Brown"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Henry Roth, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Monroe Fulkerson, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "S. F. Svenson and Harold M. Swensen, Defendants in Error, v. Lucy Roth and Paulina Hockstadter, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 18,566.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nMunicipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 26 \u2014when transcript' of record insufficient. Where, on a writ of error to the Municipal Court of Chicago, the transcript of the record which was filed in sections, does not disclose the contents of the statement of claim\u2019 and does not contain the matter necessary for the Appellate Court to consider in passing on the merits of the controversy, the finding and judgment of the trial court will not be interfered with.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge,' presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1912.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 25, 1915.\nRehearing denied February 8, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by S. F. Svenson and Harold M. Swensen against Lucy Both and Paulina Hockstadter to recover balance due on contract for the painting and interior furnishing of a house.\nTo reverse a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants prosecute error.\nHenry Roth, for plaintiffs in error.\nMonroe Fulkerson, for defendants in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic mid section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0123-01",
  "first_page_order": 167,
  "last_page_order": 167
}