{
  "id": 5383025,
  "name": "Henry L. Steinke, Plaintiff in Error, v. Julius Eisner, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Steinke v. Eisner",
  "decision_date": "1915-01-25",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,001",
  "first_page": "172",
  "last_page": "173",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "191 Ill. App. 172"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 131,
    "char_count": 1379,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.576,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.061447019797991e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3192077993736314
    },
    "sha256": "f8102f67f9ebe8b34fb38e555e79362bbdc11a036a394fcd0f9ab89fee15ddc0",
    "simhash": "1:56535894b0af28bc",
    "word_count": 238
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:18:11.463405+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Henry L. Steinke, Plaintiff in Error, v. Julius Eisner, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank Foster, for plaintiff in error.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Henry L. Steinke, Plaintiff in Error, v. Julius Eisner, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 19,001.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Caveblt, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 25, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Henry L. Steinke against Julius Eisner to recover for money loaned and merchandise sold and delivered. Upon a trial without a jury, the testimony of plaintiff in support of his claim was contradicted categorically as to each item by the testimony of defondant. To reverse a judgment entered on a finding in favor of defendant, plaintiff prosecutes a writ of error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Trial, \u00a7 286a \u2014necessity of argument. It is not error for the court trying a case without a jury to render a decision without requiring argument of counsel.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 989*\u2014when disallowance of motion for nonsuit not presented for review. Refusal of court to allow a motion to be made for a nonsuit is not presented for review where it does not appear from the record any attempt to make such a motion was made.\nFrank Foster, for plaintiff in error.\nNo appearance for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0172-01",
  "first_page_order": 216,
  "last_page_order": 217
}