{
  "id": 5385190,
  "name": "Harry Romman, Defendant in Error, v. Walter Z. Marx, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Romman v. Marx",
  "decision_date": "1915-03-08",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,253",
  "first_page": "547",
  "last_page": "548",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "191 Ill. App. 547"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1335,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.52,
    "sha256": "fab0ebdcdc4c84c0f9f9af52ade4a194935c4cd5a56ddb57a22f0d95fc264731",
    "simhash": "1:8d8ed03c302e80fc",
    "word_count": 227
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:18:11.463405+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Harry Romman, Defendant in Error, v. Walter Z. Marx, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Leo Koretz and Elmer, Cohen & Belasco, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Arnold Heap, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Harry Romman, Defendant in Error, v. Walter Z. Marx, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,253.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles A. Williams, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 8, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Harry Romman against Walter Z. Marx to recover damages for assault and battery. From a judgment on a verdict for three hundred dollars in favor of plaintiff, defendant brings error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Assault and batteby, \u00a7 22*\u2014when damages not excessive. In a civil action for assault and battery, a verdict for three hundred dollars is held not to be excessive.\n2. Assault and batteby, \u00a7 13*\u2014admissibility of weapon in evidence. In an action for damages for assault and battery, the admission in evidence of a file, which was not found until two days after the assault and which was not shown to have been used by the defendant, held not to have been prejudicially erroneous, since the jury fnight have properly found from the evidence, that the defendant inflicted the injuries by striking the plaintiff upon the head with some instrument.\nLeo Koretz and Elmer, Cohen & Belasco, for plaintiff in error.\nArnold Heap, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0547-01",
  "first_page_order": 591,
  "last_page_order": 592
}