{
  "id": 5385369,
  "name": "Krause & Managan Lumber Company, Defendant in Error, v. Consolidated Adjustment Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Krause & Managan Lumber Co. v. Consolidated Adjustment Co.",
  "decision_date": "1915-03-08",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,369",
  "first_page": "582",
  "last_page": "583",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "191 Ill. App. 582"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "190 Ill. App. 30",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2901451
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/190/0030-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "189 Ill. App. 287",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2909741
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/189/0287-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 174,
    "char_count": 2267,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.548,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15868743698956966
    },
    "sha256": "94406e7e2f463efa9afb7e109a7ea7a8d0f285cea43fb3249cfb1354bd2a4316",
    "simhash": "1:595f9895d09ca8c9",
    "word_count": 368
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:18:11.463405+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Krause & Managan Lumber Company, Defendant in Error, v. Consolidated Adjustment Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Delavan B. Cole, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Harry A. Brossat, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Krause & Managan Lumber Company, Defendant in Error, v. Consolidated Adjustment Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,369.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Chables A. Williams, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 8, 1915.\nRehearing denied March 22, 1915,\nStatement of the Case.\nAction of the fourth class in the Municipal Court of Chicago by Krause & Managan Lumber Company, a corporation, against Consolidated Adjustment Company, a corporation, on a contract substantially like those considered in Pritz v. Consolidated Adjustment Co., 189 Ill. App. 287, and Baltimore Trust Co. v. Consolidated Adjustment Co., 190 Ill. App. 30.\nThe ground of recovery alleged by plaintiff is defendant\u2019s failure to perform the service which it contracted.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Courts, \u00a7 149 \u2014when decision in other actions on similar contracts followed. Contracts involved in Pritg v. Consolidated Adjustment Co., 189 111. App. 287, and Baltimore Trust Co. v. Consolidated Adjustment Co., 190 111. App. 30, examined and held substantially like the contract in suit and the decisions in those cases, in so far as applicable, reaffirmed.\n2. Contracts, \u00a7 323*\u2014when default in performance warrants recovery. In an action on a contract, where the evidence justifies the finding of the jury that the defendant failed to give plaintiff the service which, under the contract, it agreed to give, whereby the object of the contract was defeated, the finding of the jury for the plaintiff will not be disturbed.\n3. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 13*\u2014when statement of claim in fourth-class case sufficient. The statement of claim in a case of the fourth class in the Municipal Court of Chicago is sufficient if it shows the nature of the demand even though it does not designate the character of the action with technical accuracy.\nTo reverse a judgment for plaintiff on the verdict of the jury, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nDelavan B. Cole, for plaintiff in error.\nHarry A. Brossat, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0582-01",
  "first_page_order": 626,
  "last_page_order": 627
}