{
  "id": 5381463,
  "name": "H. Laskey, Defendant in Error, v. Samuel Mendelson and Benjamin Mendelson, trading as Mendelson Brothers, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Laskey v. Mendelson",
  "decision_date": "1915-03-08",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,590",
  "first_page": "597",
  "last_page": "598",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "191 Ill. App. 597"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1666,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.515,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7518853415778295
    },
    "sha256": "0948f9096884489963cbd9fa894168ae00fae4a4b0ed9d110d0f577bbaff573e",
    "simhash": "1:804dce2036c81285",
    "word_count": 272
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:18:11.463405+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "H. Laskey, Defendant in Error, v. Samuel Mendelson and Benjamin Mendelson, trading as Mendelson Brothers, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Moses, Rosenthal & Kennedy, for plaintiffs in error; Julius Moses and Sigmund W. David, of counsel.",
      "Isadore S. Blumenthal, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "H. Laskey, Defendant in Error, v. Samuel Mendelson and Benjamin Mendelson, trading as Mendelson Brothers, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 20,590.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph S. La Buy, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1914.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed March 8, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by H. Laskey, plaintiff, against Samuel Mendelson and Benjamin Mendelson, trading as Mendel-son Brothers, defendants, to recover the purchase price of goods alleged to have been sold defendants.\nDefendants\u2019 offer of evidence tending to show that the goods had been sold to other than defendants was objected to by plaintiff on the ground that the affidavit of defense contained nothing concerning a sale to another than defendants and the objection\" was sustained.\n\u25a0Judgment was rendered for plaintiff and to reverse the judgment, defendants prosecute this writ of error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nPleading, \u00a7 28 \u2014when statement of evidence in affidavit of defense not required. In an action for the purchase price of goods alleged to have been sold, it is error to refuse to permit defendants to introduce testimony tending to show that the goods were sold to another than defendants, even though the affidavit of defense did not set up the sale to other than defendants.\nMoses, Rosenthal & Kennedy, for plaintiffs in error; Julius Moses and Sigmund W. David, of counsel.\nIsadore S. Blumenthal, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, \u00abw\u00bb\u00ab topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0597-01",
  "first_page_order": 641,
  "last_page_order": 642
}