{
  "id": 5381278,
  "name": "Aetna Life Insurance Company, Defendant in Error, v. Wadeford Electric Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Aetna Life Insurance v. Wadeford Electric Co.",
  "decision_date": "1915-03-08",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,693",
  "first_page": "606",
  "last_page": "607",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "191 Ill. App. 606"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1664,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.552,
    "sha256": "83a1f820f410c52615c318bfeb7068193486cfa65e961976c33350bd72eb11b5",
    "simhash": "1:d17d82d5f2c920cc",
    "word_count": 269
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:18:11.463405+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Aetna Life Insurance Company, Defendant in Error, v. Wadeford Electric Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Daniel M. Mickey, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Frederick K. Warne, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Aetna Life Insurance Company, Defendant in Error, v. Wadeford Electric Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,698.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. James C. Maktin, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 8, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Aetna Life Insurance Company, plaintiff, against Wadeford Electric Company, a corporation, defendant, to recover premiums alleged to be due under certain policies of liability insurance issued at the special instance and request of defendant.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Municipal Coubt of Chicago, \u00a7 27 \u2014when motions and orders not reviewable. Motions and ordprs striking affidavits of defense from the files cannot he reviewed on a writ of error unless they are preserved by a bill of exceptions.\n2. Municipal Coubt of Chicago, \u00a7 26*\u2014when matters not preserved in record not reviewable. On a writ of error to reverse a judgment in an action to recover premiums alleged to be due under insurance policies, where the policies are not preserved in the record, the court cannot consider their provisions.\nDefendant\u2019s affidavit of defense was struck from the files, as was also its amended affidavit of defense. No propositions of law were submitted.\nTo reverse judgment for plaintiff for $82.22 entered on his affidavit of claim, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nDaniel M. Mickey, for plaintiff in error.\nFrederick K. Warne, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0606-01",
  "first_page_order": 650,
  "last_page_order": 651
}