{
  "id": 2890742,
  "name": "William H. Durant, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. Scott Matthews et al., Defendants in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Durant v. Matthews",
  "decision_date": "1915-03-29",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,796",
  "first_page": "203",
  "last_page": "204",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "192 Ill. App. 203"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 940,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.532,
    "sha256": "1ab06e0fc8682d8fe8fe4b25e4372465ae2c1051ccaea80a3ba3df8255623276",
    "simhash": "1:417d28b1d39db29c",
    "word_count": 162
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:32:59.384140+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William H. Durant, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. Scott Matthews et al., Defendants in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "V. S. Lumley, for plaintiff in error.",
      "John J. Poulton and John J. Mahoney, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William H. Durant, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. Scott Matthews et al., Defendants in Error.\nGen. No. 20,796.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oscab E. Heabd, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 29, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nWilliam H. Durant, plaintiff, against W. Scott Matthews and others, defendants.\nThe facts are the same as those in Erickson v. Matthews, ante, p. 201.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nMandamus, \u00a7 51 \u2014when writ will not lie for restoration to public office. The decision in Erickson v. Matthews, ante, p. 201, held to be controlling in this case and adhered to.\nV. S. Lumley, for plaintiff in error.\nJohn J. Poulton and John J. Mahoney, for defendants in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0203-01",
  "first_page_order": 227,
  "last_page_order": 228
}