{
  "id": 2892392,
  "name": "George Studtmann, Defendant in Error, v. Union Grove Creamery Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Studtmann v. Union Grove Creamery Co.",
  "decision_date": "1915-04-13",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,415",
  "first_page": "248",
  "last_page": "249",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "192 Ill. App. 248"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1628,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.518,
    "sha256": "dd5a777ac224584f8b6ee53281c7d21a5a3c5a0ba6ecf1cb531c3602ec453805",
    "simhash": "1:c831c68f140db4de",
    "word_count": 264
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:32:59.384140+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George Studtmann, Defendant in Error, v. Union Grove Creamery Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Gridley\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Gridley"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Francis E. Croarkin, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Levisohn & Levisohn, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George Studtmann, Defendant in Error, v. Union Grove Creamery Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,415.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John K. Pbindiviule, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1914.\nAffirmed in part and reversed in part with finding of fact.\nOpinion filed April 13, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by George Studtmann, against the Union Grove Creamery Company, the plaintiff in his affidavit for attachment declaring on an account stated and for goods sold and delivered, and stating that the defendant was about fraudulently to dispose of its property against the interest of his creditors. Defendant gave bond and made an affidavit to the merits. From a judgment in favor of the defendant on these issues, defendant excepted and brings error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Account stated, \u00a7 3 \u2014when evidence sustains judgment. Evidence in an action upon an account stated held sufficient to sustain a judgment in favor of plaintiff.\n2. Attachment, \u00a7 47*\u2014when evidence insufficient to sustain issues. Evidence on an issue in attachment held insufficient to sustain plaintiff\u2019s claim that defendant at the time suit was brought, or at any other time, was about fraudulently to conceal, assign or otherwise dispose of its property so as to hinder and delay its creditors.\nFrancis E. Croarkin, for plaintiff in error.\nLevisohn & Levisohn, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0248-01",
  "first_page_order": 272,
  "last_page_order": 273
}