{
  "id": 2895628,
  "name": "William J. Lemp Brewing Company, Defendant in Error, v. Alliance Assurance Company, Ltd., Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "William J. Lemp Brewing Co. v. Alliance Assurance Co.",
  "decision_date": "1915-04-22",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,610",
  "first_page": "300",
  "last_page": "301",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "192 Ill. App. 300"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 196,
    "char_count": 2586,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.538,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.207966869300525e-08,
      "percentile": 0.32747893796124794
    },
    "sha256": "8008b36176df49289692b07807a3242a0e86e4145f2ee7af99e9c34dbd85662f",
    "simhash": "1:7f3ad231116fb0bc",
    "word_count": 432
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:32:59.384140+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William J. Lemp Brewing Company, Defendant in Error, v. Alliance Assurance Company, Ltd., Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Pitch\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 26*\u2014when party not estopped to object of failure to file report in time. The indorsement of \u201cO. K.\u201d upon a stenographic report by counsel for defendant in error does not estop the latter from objecting that it was not filed in time.\n3. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 26*\u2014what does not create estoppel to move striking of report. The fact that counsel for defendant in error knowingly permitted plaintiff in error to \u201cgo to considerable expense in having printed the abstract of record and the brief and argument\u201d does not estop defendant in error from moving to strike the stenographic report as not having been filed in time.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Pitch"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George D. Wellington, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Thompson, Tyrrell & Chambers, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William J. Lemp Brewing Company, Defendant in Error, v. Alliance Assurance Company, Ltd., Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,610.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 26 -\u2014when stenographic report not filed in time. Under the Municipal Court Act, sec. 23, par. 6 (J. & A. \u00b6 3335) providing for the signing and filing of a stenographic report upon application made within thirty days after the entry of a final order or judgment, \u201cor within such further time as may, upon application therefor within said thirty days, be allowed by the court,\u201d where judgment was entered May 23rd and on the same day an order was entered extending the time for filing the stenographic report to August 31st, a further order entered on stipulation August 7th, extending the time for filing the report to September 8th, is void.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry M. Fisher, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1914.\nStenographic report stricken and judgment affirmed.\nOpinion filed April 22, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by William. J. Lemp Brewing Company, a corporation, against Alliance Assurance Company, Ltd., a corporation, for loss by fire on policy of insurance. In its affidavit of merits, defendant stated an appraisement by disinterested appraisers, as provided for in the policy; and an offer to pay the amount appraised. In an affidavit of reply, plaintiff denied notice of selection of appraisers or of the time appraisement would be made, and stated that he was not given an opportunity to be heard. Verdict for plaintiff and judgment on the verdict.\nGeorge D. Wellington, for plaintiff in error.\nThompson, Tyrrell & Chambers, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0300-01",
  "first_page_order": 324,
  "last_page_order": 325
}