{
  "id": 2896319,
  "name": "Daisy B. Page, Defendant in Error, v. Brink's Chicago City Express Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Page v. Brink's Chicago City Express Co.",
  "decision_date": "1915-04-26",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,584",
  "first_page": "389",
  "last_page": "390",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "192 Ill. App. 389"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1631,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.533,
    "sha256": "55a3e1e0249e7b7a9b0a0abc5d13972603478fdefd6ff8752a2e0f6a8fe5b7c2",
    "simhash": "1:9c7bdad7746d809c",
    "word_count": 273
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:32:59.384140+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Daisy B. Page, Defendant in Error, v. Brink\u2019s Chicago City Express Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Brown\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Brown"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William English, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Frank M. Cox and R. J. Fellingham, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Daisy B. Page, Defendant in Error, v. Brink\u2019s Chicago City Express Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,584.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Habby P. Dolan, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 26, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Daisy B. Page against Brink\u2019s Chicago City Express Company in the Municipal Court of Chicago in an action of tort, arising out of a claim for damages to the automobile of the plaintiff in a collision through the alleged negligence of the employee of the defendant. Trial without a jury. Judgment for the plaintiff for $124.15, and defendant brings error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Negligence, \u00a7 186 \u2014when ownership question of fact. The ownership of a wagon operated by an employee of the defendant in an action for damages for negligence is a question of fact.\n2. Automobiles and garages, \u00a7 2*\u2014when question of negligence and contributory negligence for jury. In an action for damages for injury to an automobile in a collision claimed to have been caused by defendant\u2019s turning sharply across the path of plaintiff\u2019s automobile, necessitating a similar turn by the latter and a consequent collision with a car in the rear, the questions of negligence and contributory negligence were held to be questions of fact.\nWilliam English, for plaintiff in error.\nFrank M. Cox and R. J. Fellingham, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and. Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0389-01",
  "first_page_order": 413,
  "last_page_order": 414
}