{
  "id": 2889560,
  "name": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Otto Gross, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of Chicago v. Gross",
  "decision_date": "1915-04-26",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,197",
  "first_page": "398",
  "last_page": "398",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "192 Ill. App. 398"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1706,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.514,
    "sha256": "c9e9a94e70d9bb524568c65c7902695da88ab9395e8a4a445ccf65beb6cf072f",
    "simhash": "1:b21bd9bc805b20b8",
    "word_count": 275
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:32:59.384140+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Otto Gross, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered the. opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "D. B. Brillow and George J. Reece, for plaintiff in error.",
      "William H. Sexton and James S. McInerney, for defendant in error; Albert J. W. Appell, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Otto Gross, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,197.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nDisorderly house, \u00a7 2 \u2014when evidence insufficient to sustain conviction. Where on a prosecution for violating an ordinance against the keeping of a house for the \u201cencouragement of idleness, gaming, drinking, fornication or other misbehaviors,\u201d the evidence showed that defendant was merely in charge of a saloon temporarily during the illness of the proprietor and was arrested on the day following that on which he took charge, and the evidence fails to show that the house was kept for prohibited purposes while defendant was in charge, a judgment of conviction will be reversed.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Rufus F. Robinson, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1914.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed April 26, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nProsecution by the City of Chicago against Otto Gross for the violation of a city ordinance directed against \u201cevery common, ill-governed or disorderly house, room or other premises, kept for the encouragement of idleness, gaming, drinking, fornication or other misbehaviors * * The proprietor of a saloon secured the services of the defendant' to operate his place of business during his illness. To reverse a judgment of conviction, plaintiff brings error.\nD. B. Brillow and George J. Reece, for plaintiff in error.\nWilliam H. Sexton and James S. McInerney, for defendant in error; Albert J. W. Appell, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0398-01",
  "first_page_order": 422,
  "last_page_order": 422
}