#### Illinois Improvement & Ballast Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Inger C. Heinsen, Executrix, Defendant in Error.

Gen. No. 21,200.

(Not to Ibe reported in full.)

Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. H. Sterling Pomeroy, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 14, 1915.

Statement, of the Case.

The judgment óf the trial court was affirmed for lack of bill of exceptions and failure to assign errors on the common-law record, the facts of the case not appearing.

David B. Maxwell, for plaintiff in error.

Moses, Rosenthal & Kennedy, for defendant in error; Julius Moses and Walter Bachrach, of counsel.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Per Curiam.

*83Abstract of tlie Decision.

Appeal and errob, §, 1746 * —when judgment affirmed where MU of exceptions stricken. Where the bill of exceptions has been stricken from the record and no errors have been assigned upon the common-law record, the judgment will be affirmed.