#### M. E. Sutker, Defendant in Error, v. United States Tent & Awning Company, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 20,433.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Fred C. Hill, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1914.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 17, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action by M. E. Sutker against the United States Tent & Awning Company to recover for the amount alleged to be due plaintiff for electrical work and materials furnished to the defendant, partly on a written contract and partly on oral contracts.

From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Litzinger, McGurn & Reid, for plaintiff in error; Leonard C. Reid, of counsel.

*334Abstract of the Decision.

Assumpsit, action of, § 66 * —when evidence sustains recovery. Evidence in an action to recover for electrical work done and materials furnished to defendant, partly on a written contract and partly on oral contracts, held sufficient to sustain a verdict for plaintiff.

Rittenhouse & Beilman, for defendant in error; John J. Beilman, of counsel.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.