{
  "id": 2880508,
  "name": "Max Draeger and Otto Draeger, trading as Draeger Brothers, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Wisconsin Steel Company and F. E. McGrew, Defendants in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Draeger v. Wisconsin Steel Co.",
  "decision_date": "1915-06-17",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,436",
  "first_page": "440",
  "last_page": "440",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "194 Ill. App. 440"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 130,
    "char_count": 1446,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.527,
    "sha256": "07aa6ddf7afb161cfd9dfa34b2ad54a3dd4fc390e7c35b65475f8a6d59e9a0bc",
    "simhash": "1:a35dd53c50ed355c",
    "word_count": 245
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:49:21.752065+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Max Draeger and Otto Draeger, trading as Draeger Brothers, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Wisconsin Steel Company and F. E. McGrew, Defendants in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Pam\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Pam"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Harry C. Leemon, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Elmer O. Rathfon and C. S. Stilwell, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Max Draeger and Otto Draeger, trading as Draeger Brothers, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Wisconsin Steel Company and F. E. McGrew, Defendants in Error.\nGen. No. 20,436.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Feed C. Hill, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 17, 1915.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Assignments, \u00a7 3 \u2014when void as to wages. An assignment of wages executed prior to the time a person obtains employment is void as to wages earned under such employment.\n2. Bankruptcy, \u00a7 72 \u2014when discharge hars recovery on assignment of wages. A discharge in bankruptcy is a good defense to an action upon an assignment of wages where the assignment was of wages to be earned under a future employment.'\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Max Draeger and Otto Draeger, trading as Draeger Brothers against Wisconsin Steel Company, a corporation and F. E. McGrew for moneys and groceries furnished by plaintiffs to said McGrew, and upon an assignment of wages due, or to become due to said McGrew, while in employ of the other defendant. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.\nHarry C. Leemon, for plaintiffs in error.\nElmer O. Rathfon and C. S. Stilwell, for defendants in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0440-01",
  "first_page_order": 462,
  "last_page_order": 462
}