{
  "id": 2876978,
  "name": "Edwin Palm, Defendant in Error, v. John Johnson and Axel Johnson, trading as Johnson Brothers, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Palm v. Johnson",
  "decision_date": "1915-10-05",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,530",
  "first_page": "478",
  "last_page": "478",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "194 Ill. App. 478"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1447,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.546,
    "sha256": "f0374a17440b7a663f88d614a7b3a68ddee7e3d66fc31d5662441a419b405009",
    "simhash": "1:19f6e137f48f17fc",
    "word_count": 231
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:49:21.752065+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edwin Palm, Defendant in Error, v. John Johnson and Axel Johnson, trading as Johnson Brothers, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ragnar Oberg, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Sophus Dabelstein, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edwin Palm, Defendant in Error, v. John Johnson and Axel Johnson, trading as Johnson Brothers, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 20,530.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph S. La But, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1914.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed October 5, 1915.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nContracts, \u00a7 323 \u2014when judgment erroneous on proof of nonperformance. Where in an action to recover on contracts for painting and decorating defendants\u2019 buildings, the court found for plaintiff for the amount alleged in the statement of claim to be due,, but in so doing ignored undisputed evidence that the contracts were not fully performed, held that the judgment, was erroneous, for the reason that the finding gave no credit to defendant for work not done according to the contracts.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Edwin Palm, plaintiff, against John Johnson and Axel Johnson, trading as Johnson Brothers, defendants, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, to recover on contracts for painting and decorating defendants\u2019 buildings. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff for $376, defendants prosecute this writ of error.\nRagnar Oberg, for plaintiffs in error.\nSophus Dabelstein, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0478-01",
  "first_page_order": 500,
  "last_page_order": 500
}