{
  "id": 2879027,
  "name": "Rosina Leindecker, Defendant in Error, v. Joseph J. Schaeffer, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Leindecker v. Schaeffer",
  "decision_date": "1915-10-05",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,553",
  "first_page": "508",
  "last_page": "509",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "194 Ill. App. 508"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 138,
    "char_count": 1575,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.551,
    "sha256": "4d398f32cd3b5495f8b50150707d6091e74137e91f4e1af966edfa7a23fc70cf",
    "simhash": "1:8543c091c0af903c",
    "word_count": 267
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:49:21.752065+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Rosina Leindecker, Defendant in Error, v. Joseph J. Schaeffer, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Frauds, Statute of, \u00a7 24 \u2014when lease void under. A verbal agreement for a lease for a year to begin in futuro is void under the Statute of Frauds.\n2. Landlord and tenant, \u00a7 88 \u2014when lessor\u2019s assent to holding over essential to renew term. A tenant under a written lease cannot, by holding over after the expiration of the term, and refusing to surrender possession, create a tenancy at will or at suffranee, for the reason that until the landlord recognizes the new tenancy, by acceptance of rent, or otherwise, the holding over is a mere offer to become a tenant on the terms of the former lease, not assented to by the landlord.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Henry Roth, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Martin C. Koebel, for defendant in error; E. M. Seymour, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Rosina Leindecker, Defendant in Error, v. Joseph J. Schaeffer, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,553.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edward T. Wade, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 5, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction of forcible detainer by Rosina Leindecker, plaintiff, against Joseph J. Schaeffer, defendant, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, to recover possession of premises of which defendant retained possession after the expiration of the term of a lease. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nHenry Roth, for plaintiff in error.\nMartin C. Koebel, for defendant in error; E. M. Seymour, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly,, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0508-01",
  "first_page_order": 530,
  "last_page_order": 531
}