#### Pete Krakis et al., Defendants in Error, v. James H. Hooper, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 20,488.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edward T. Wade, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1915.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 15, 1915.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Pete Krakis and others, plaintiffs, against James H. Hooper, defendant, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, to recover on a verbal -agreement for the installation of a sewer, catch basin and water-closet in a building of defendant. To reverse a judgment of one hundred dollars for plaintiffs, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.

James H. Hooper, pro se.

No appearance for defendants in error.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

*343Abstract of the Decision.

Assumpsit, action of, § 89 * —when finding sustained. In an action to recover on a verbal contract to install a sewer, catch basin and water-closet in defendant’s building, where the evidence was conflicting, evidence held to sustain a finding of one hundred dollars for plaintiffs.