{
  "id": 2876348,
  "name": "Marie Hansen and Herman Busch, trading as Hansen Busch Auto Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Albert G. Ferree, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hansen v. Ferree",
  "decision_date": "1915-10-05",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,410",
  "first_page": "27",
  "last_page": "28",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 Ill. App. 27"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 178,
    "char_count": 2191,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.562,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.5330875625009783e-08,
      "percentile": 0.28396925843939164
    },
    "sha256": "553eaaeed3986cff1bf713ecccdb55825e14dd40037c5e0caee17223dbf131e4",
    "simhash": "1:c7750a36b686248b",
    "word_count": 366
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:01.145099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Marie Hansen and Herman Busch, trading as Hansen Busch Auto Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Albert G. Ferree, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McGoorty\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McGoorty"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "B. M. Shaffner, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "George L. Turnbull, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Marie Hansen and Herman Busch, trading as Hansen Busch Auto Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Albert G. Ferree, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 20,410.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry M. Fisher, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 5, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nSuit by Marie Hansen and Herman Busch, copartners, trading as Hansen Busch Auto Company, against Albert G. Ferree, based upon a verbal contract to recover for labor and material furnished in erecting and equipping an automobile.\nAll of the items of labor and material set forth in plaintiffs\u2019 affidavit of claim were disputed by the defendant. The principal contention, however, related to the number of hours of labor expended on said car. There was a trial by jury, who found the issues against thq plaintiffs and judgment was entered thereon, whereupon the plaintiffs sued out this writ of error.\nB. M. Shaffner, for plaintiffs in error.\nGeorge L. Turnbull, for defendant in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Assumpsit, action of, \u00a7 88 \u2014what evidence is proper to show amount of labor furnished. In a suit to recover for labor and material furnished in erecting and equipping an automobile, time cards showing the hours of work spent by servants on each automobile, which were properly identified, were erroneously rejected as evidence.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1253 \u2014when error in the exclusion of evidence ccmnot be complained of. In an action to recover for labor and material furnished in erecting and equipping an automobile, error in the exclusion of time cards tending to show the amount of labor furnished cannot be complained of by the plaintiff where the record shows a recovery in excess of the amount which could have been recovered if such time cards had been admitted in evidence.\n3. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1410 \u2014when verdict not disturbed. A verdict not manifestly against the weight of evidence will not be disturbed on appeal.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0027-01",
  "first_page_order": 53,
  "last_page_order": 54
}