{
  "id": 2872680,
  "name": "Louis Buendert, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charles Bostrom et al., trading as Henry E. Strassheim & Company, Defendants in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Buendert v. Bostrom",
  "decision_date": "1915-10-06",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,790",
  "first_page": "55",
  "last_page": "56",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 Ill. App. 55"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1975,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.556,
    "sha256": "4157f47f45338e0c8647b705aa69a8c66c2c3ba795f27e7b8bd7297b8485d7a8",
    "simhash": "1:c3d9ac94594c93fe",
    "word_count": 321
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:01.145099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Louis Buendert, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charles Bostrom et al., trading as Henry E. Strassheim & Company, Defendants in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jarrell & McNeil, for plaintiff in error.",
      "William G. Wise and Roger Faherty, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Louis Buendert, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charles Bostrom et al., trading as Henry E. Strassheim & Company, Defendants in Error.\nGen. No. 20,790.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hugh R. Stewart, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1914.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed October 6, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction of the fourth class in the Municipal Court of Chicago by Louis Buendert against Charles Bostrom, Henry E. Strassheim and Adolph F. Boericke, trading as Henry E. Strassheim & Company. The plaintiff\u2019s original statement of claim and the first and second more specific statements of claim, having been stricken from the files on motion of the defendants, the plaintiff, pursuant to the order of the court, filed Ms third more specific statement of claim. On motion of the defendants, this last-mentioned statement of claim was ordered stricken from the files and the suit was dismissed at the plaintiff\u2019s costs. This writ of error followed.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nMunicipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 13 \u2014when statement of claim erroneously stricken from files. Statement of claim in an action to recover money paid on a contract for the purchase of realty on the ground that such payment was induced by the fraudulent representations of the defendants as to the dimensions of the property covered by the contract, held sufficient to present a claim for fraud and deceit, and hence the striking of the statement from the flies on the theory that the plaintiff was attempting to vary a written contract by antecedent representations was erroneous, since the plaintiff\u2019s action was not based upon the contract.\nJarrell & McNeil, for plaintiff in error.\nWilliam G. Wise and Roger Faherty, for defendants in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0055-01",
  "first_page_order": 81,
  "last_page_order": 82
}