{
  "id": 2870159,
  "name": "Sara G. Huggins, Appellee, v. Lilly Gottschalk et al. Albert Wesley Gottschalk, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Huggins v. Gottschalk",
  "decision_date": "1915-10-06",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,942",
  "first_page": "64",
  "last_page": "65",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 Ill. App. 64"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 181,
    "char_count": 2080,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.555,
    "sha256": "192708808563942279828bd8d71151fc35f61dcdf7f268b106628278f356297c",
    "simhash": "1:934dcad4528f328c",
    "word_count": 345
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:01.145099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Sara G. Huggins, Appellee, v. Lilly Gottschalk et al. Albert Wesley Gottschalk, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Albert Wesley Gottschalk, pro se.",
      "Sonnenschein, Berkson & Fishell, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Sara G. Huggins, Appellee, v. Lilly Gottschalk et al. Albert Wesley Gottschalk, Appellant.\nGen. No. 20,942.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John M. Connor, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 6, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill to foreclose a trust deed covering certain real estate in Cook county, filed in the Superior Court by Sara G. Huggins. The trust deed was executed by Lilly Gottschalk, and was given to secure the payment of certain promissory notes. All of the notes were signed by said Lilly Gottschalk and were made payable to herself, and were indorsed by her and Albert Wesley Gottschalk. At the time of the filing of the bill, some of the notes were owned by the complainant. A decree was entered finding, inter alia, that there was due to the complainant the sum of $641.47, with interest thereon from December 27, 1912, and also the sum of $75 as reasonable solicitor\u2019s fees, and a sale of the real estate was ordered, unless such sums, together with the costs of the suit, yrere paid within ten days. The decree further provided that \u201cafter the coming in and the confirmation of the master\u2019s report of sale in case any deficiency is shown in the amount due to the complainant, Sara G. Huggins, she shall be entitled to execution against the defendant, Lilly Gottschalk and Albert Wesley Gottschalk, personally liable therefor.\u201d This appeal is prosecuted to reverse said decree, and the sole appellant is Albert Wesley Gottschalk.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAppeal and error, \u00a7 308 \u2014what decision not reviewaMe on appeal. A conditional deficiency decree not being final nor appealable, the propriety of entering such a decree against the indorser of mortgage notes is not reviewable.\nAlbert Wesley Gottschalk, pro se.\nSonnenschein, Berkson & Fishell, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0064-01",
  "first_page_order": 90,
  "last_page_order": 91
}