{
  "id": 2877423,
  "name": "Samuel Atkins, Defendant in Error, v. William Smith, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Atkins v. Smith",
  "decision_date": "1915-10-06",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,666",
  "first_page": "166",
  "last_page": "167",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 Ill. App. 166"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 138,
    "char_count": 1600,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.546,
    "sha256": "9f346d76cd58f2d87ed7a6d77c0ecabf63d80d5203e0c649d60e28c4ed62cb65",
    "simhash": "1:cb54cf2dc4a974bd",
    "word_count": 272
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:01.145099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Samuel Atkins, Defendant in Error, v. William Smith, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Pam\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Pam"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William C. Smith, for plaintiff in error.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Samuel Atkins, Defendant in Error, v. William Smith, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,666.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Robert H. Scott, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 6, 1915.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1414 \u2014when finding of trial court not disturbed on appeal. A finding of a trial court that services of a court stenographer were rendered to an attorney instead of his client will not be disturbed on appeal, it appearing that such finding was not clearly and manifestly against the weight of the evidence.\n2. New trial, \u00a7 76 \u2014when properly denied. A motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence is properly denied where the affidavits show that such evidence is merely cumulative, and there is nothing to show that the party, at the trial, attempted to secure such evidence, or asked for a continuance to obtain it.\nStatement of the Case.\nSuit by Samuel Atkins against William Smith for services rendered in reporting a case wherein defendant was attorney for the plaintiff. On the trial below before the court without a jury, the court found the issues for the plaintiff and entered judgment against the defendant for $19.75, to reverse which the defendant has sued out this writ of error.\nWilliam C. Smith, for plaintiff in error.\nNo appearance for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0166-01",
  "first_page_order": 192,
  "last_page_order": 193
}