{
  "id": 2872579,
  "name": "Charles A. Phelps, Appellee, v. Thomas M. Hunter, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Phelps v. Hunter",
  "decision_date": "1915-10-06",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,889",
  "first_page": "181",
  "last_page": "182",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 Ill. App. 181"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1542,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.547,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.087085966315723e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3778569715840576
    },
    "sha256": "c54d32f01cdcf6b5ad94792bfe8440c9f1086ee78be47637b58b1de9b65fcbc5",
    "simhash": "1:511ec394582d26d8",
    "word_count": 262
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:01.145099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles A. Phelps, Appellee, v. Thomas M. Hunter, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Pam\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Judgment, \u00a7 232 \u2014what constitutes entry. The entry of a judgment is a ministerial act which consists in spreading it upon the record or writing it at large in a docket or other official book.\n3. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 19 \u2014how judgment evidenced. A judgment of the Municipal Court of Chicago is evidenced not by an order, as entered on half sheets, but by the order as spread out on the record by the clerk.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Pam"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Emery S. Walker and Charles M. Ruth, for appellant.",
      "Arthur L. Ballas, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles A. Phelps, Appellee, v. Thomas M. Hunter, Appellant.\nGen. No. 20,889.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Judgment, \u00a7 170 \u2014what constitutes rendition. The rendition of a judgment is the judicial act of the court in pronouncing the sentence of the law upon the facts in controversy as ascertained by the pleadings and verdict.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard E. Burke, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1914.\nReversed and judgment here.\nOpinion filed October 6, 1915.\nRehearing denied October 15, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction of replevin by Charles A. Phelps against Thomas M. Hunter, bailiff of the Municipal Court of Chicago. From a judgment for .plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nEmery S. Walker and Charles M. Ruth, for appellant.\nArthur L. Ballas, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0181-01",
  "first_page_order": 207,
  "last_page_order": 208
}