{
  "id": 2871734,
  "name": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Jane Doe, alias Mrs. Mary Metz, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of Chicago v. Doe",
  "decision_date": "1915-11-15",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,093",
  "first_page": "334",
  "last_page": "335",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 Ill. App. 334"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1541,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.582,
    "sha256": "e3e74a3798f8ad51d6b8d8b2ebcaae6240ad5337bdb73a9236b5b10131794ed3",
    "simhash": "1:9151c3a5b5a90279",
    "word_count": 255
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:01.145099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Jane Doe, alias Mrs. Mary Metz, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles Horgan, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Richard S. Folsom and Harry B. Miller, for defendant in error; John F. Power, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Jane Doe, alias Mrs. Mary Metz, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,093.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Newcomer, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 15, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nProsecution by the City of Chicago against Jane Doe, alias Mrs. Mary Metz, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, charging defendant with being the keeper of a disorderly house in violation of section 2019 of the Chicago Code. To reverse a judgment of conviction, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nCharles Horgan, for plaintiff in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Disorderly house, \u00a7 1 \u2014when evidence sufficient to support judgment. In a prosecution charging defendant with being the keeper of a disorderly house in violation of section 2019 of the Chicago Code, evidence held sufficient to prove that the character of the house was within the language of the ordinance.\n2. Disorderly house, \u00a7 2 \u2014when evidence sufficient to show keeping. In a prosecution wherein defendant was charged with being the keeper of a disorderly house in violation of section 2019 of the Chicago Code, evidence held sufficient to sustain a judgment of conviction.\nRichard S. Folsom and Harry B. Miller, for defendant in error; John F. Power, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0334-01",
  "first_page_order": 360,
  "last_page_order": 361
}