{
  "id": 2877210,
  "name": "T. W. Schulze, trading as T. W. Schulze & Company, Defendant in Error, v. J. S. Parrish, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Schulze v. Parrish",
  "decision_date": "1915-11-15",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,052",
  "first_page": "348",
  "last_page": "349",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 Ill. App. 348"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1727,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.569,
    "sha256": "369ec2f60745c7573897230cf369a4bf7aed7dbcbc821dbabbc28f47fd88c2b6",
    "simhash": "1:4150c9dcd98d3b1e",
    "word_count": 286
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:01.145099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "T. W. Schulze, trading as T. W. Schulze & Company, Defendant in Error, v. J. S. Parrish, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nBrokers, \u00a7 71 \u2014when judgment for plaintiff improper. In an action to recover broker\u2019s commissions for negotiating an exchange of real estate, where the affidavit of claim is for \u201cthe usual, ordinary and customary brokerage commission,\u201d but where the evidence for plaintiff showed that there was a special agreement as to the rate of commission to be paid plaintiff by defendant, held error to stop defendant in his testimony and to refuse to allow him to continue or to hear his other witnesses and to announce a finding and judgment, where defendant testified that the agreement was that defendant should not be liable for plaintiff\u2019s commissions but should obtain them from the other party to the exchange.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Martin L. Wilborn, for plaintiff in error; John W. Sutton, of counsel.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "T. W. Schulze, trading as T. W. Schulze & Company, Defendant in Error, v. J. S. Parrish, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,052.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edward T. Wade, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1915.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed November 15, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by T. W. Schulze, trading as T. W. Schulze & Company, plaintiff, against J. S. Parrish, defendant, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, to recover broker\u2019s commissions for negotiating an exchange of real estate of defendant for other real estate owned by a third person. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff for $92.50, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nMartin L. Wilborn, for plaintiff in error; John W. Sutton, of counsel.\nNo appearance for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0348-01",
  "first_page_order": 374,
  "last_page_order": 375
}