{
  "id": 2875225,
  "name": "Panagiotis Zisinatos and Andreas Galineas, Appellees, v. Continental & Commercial National Bank and Anton J. Cermak, Bailiff, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Zisinatos v. Continental & Commercial National Bank",
  "decision_date": "1915-11-16",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,017",
  "first_page": "375",
  "last_page": "376",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 Ill. App. 375"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 2020,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.53,
    "sha256": "61ea5063f935ec522b0c4c516b3003351998193ac4cf38b010c8e61069ec003e",
    "simhash": "1:915ec091d0a5bcd8",
    "word_count": 336
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:01.145099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Panagiotis Zisinatos and Andreas Galineas, Appellees, v. Continental & Commercial National Bank and Anton J. Cermak, Bailiff, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n3. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 24 \u2014when judgment not appeal-able. There being no statute authorizing an appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago in a fourth-class case, an appeal cannot be taken in such case, and if taken will be dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, for appellants.",
      "G. A. Buresh, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Panagiotis Zisinatos and Andreas Galineas, Appellees, v. Continental & Commercial National Bank and Anton J. Cermak, Bailiff, Appellants.\nGen. No. 22,017.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 10 \u2014when action for trial of \u25a0right to property is of fourth class. A proceeding for the trial of the right to property is an action of the fourth class under the Municipal Court Act, sec. 2, subd. 4 (d) (J. & A. 3314).\n2. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 27 \u2014when extension of time for filing hill of exceptions not in apt time. Where it appears that an extension of the time for filing a bill of exceptions in a fourth-class action under section 2, subd. 4 (d) of the Municipal Court Act (J. & A. If 3314) was not made within thirty days from ttie rendition of the judgment appealed from, the Appellate Court will strike the bill of exceptions on motion of appellee, for the reason that an extension of such filing time is not allowed except within thirty days from the rendition of such judgment.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. R. F. Robinson, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.\nAppeal dismissed.\nOpinion filed November 16, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Panagiotis Zisinatos and Andreas Galineas, plaintiffs, against the Continental & Commercial National Bank and Anton J. Cermak, bailiff of the Municipal Court of Chicago, defendants, in the Municipal Court of Chicago. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.\nMayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, for appellants.\nG. A. Buresh, for appellees.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0375-01",
  "first_page_order": 401,
  "last_page_order": 402
}