{
  "id": 2872790,
  "name": "Maria Peters, Defendant in Error, v. John A. Reddy and Fanny Reddy, Plaintiffs in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Peters v. Reddy",
  "decision_date": "1915-12-21",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,044",
  "first_page": "579",
  "last_page": "580",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 Ill. App. 579"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 106,
    "char_count": 1161,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.555,
    "sha256": "e838b3b9b78e73f5f6d3bc2c92574db34e91f1e99cb4dc9cac6f1833d2b1bbff",
    "simhash": "1:9d99100050cbb0ba",
    "word_count": 187
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:01.145099+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Maria Peters, Defendant in Error, v. John A. Reddy and Fanny Reddy, Plaintiffs in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "King, Brower & Hurlbut, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "John Lace, for defendant in error; Rankin & Dunn and Ode L. Rankin, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Maria Peters, Defendant in Error, v. John A. Reddy and Fanny Reddy, Plaintiffs in Error.\nGen. No. 21,044.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Newcomer, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 21, 1915.\nRehearing denied January 4, 1916.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nBills and notes, \u00a7 440 \u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain judgment. In an action to recover on a promissory note, judgment for plaintiff held sustained by the evidence as against defendants\u2019 claim of want of consideration.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Maria Peters, plaintiff, against John A. Reddy and Fanny Reddy, defendants, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, to recover on a promissory note. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff, defendants prosecute this-writ of error.\nKing, Brower & Hurlbut, for plaintiffs in error.\nJohn Lace, for defendant in error; Rankin & Dunn and Ode L. Rankin, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0579-01",
  "first_page_order": 605,
  "last_page_order": 606
}