{
  "id": 2866563,
  "name": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Otto Coorth, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of Chicago v. Coorth",
  "decision_date": "1915-12-21",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,210",
  "first_page": "38",
  "last_page": "39",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "196 Ill. App. 38"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 86,
    "char_count": 894,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.603,
    "sha256": "a34af3b2d6f3cedb18edb53b7830cc25fb3f8d747f40efc45e9f19153fd11d9f",
    "simhash": "1:87706e1dd03d88bc",
    "word_count": 155
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:31:56.876051+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Otto Coorth, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McGoorty\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McGoorty"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George Remus, for plaintiff in error.",
      "John W. Beckwith and Albert J. W. Appell, for defendant in error; John F. Power, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Otto Coorth, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 20,210.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Frederick L. Fake, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1914.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 21, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by the City of Chicago against Otto Coorth, defendant, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, to recover a penalty for violation of section 2012 of the Chicago Code of 1911. This case presents the same questions of law raised in City of Chicago v. Lesser, No. 20,211, ante, p. 37, and a judgment for plaintiff in this case was affirmed on the authority of that case.\nGeorge Remus, for plaintiff in error.\nJohn W. Beckwith and Albert J. W. Appell, for defendant in error; John F. Power, of counsel."
  },
  "file_name": "0038-01",
  "first_page_order": 86,
  "last_page_order": 87
}