{
  "id": 2867998,
  "name": "Anna Weltz, Appellee, v. John R. Connell, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Weltz v. Connell",
  "decision_date": "1915-10-20",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 6,110",
  "first_page": "211",
  "last_page": "212",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "196 Ill. App. 211"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "186 Ill. App. 336",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5370152
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/186/0336-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 164,
    "char_count": 1804,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.559,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08521828878826526
    },
    "sha256": "c217c60a8c43ca6c307e3b3f3c1887b19080096629866f37513aa8f4bfa29824",
    "simhash": "1:0ec3c801de3e0013",
    "word_count": 297
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:31:56.876051+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Anna Weltz, Appellee, v. John R. Connell, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Dibell\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Dibell"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "B. K. Welsh and Brearton & Walter, for appellant.",
      "F. J. Stransky, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Anna Weltz, Appellee, v. John R. Connell, Appellant.\nGen. No. 6,110.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Carroll county; the Hon. James S. Baume, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the April term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 20, 1915.\nCertiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Anna Weltz, plaintiff, against John R. Connell, defendant.\nThe facts in this case are stated in Weltz v. Connell, 186 Ill. App. 336. That opinion, reversing and remanding the cause, was based upon the refusal of the court to give instruction No. 17, requested by appellant, which would have told the jury that, before the plaintiff could recover, she must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that misrepresentations relative to the land in question were made by the defendant, that such misrepresentations were false and known by the defendant to be false when made, that the plaintiff was deceived thereby, and that she had been injured because of them. This instruction was given upon the second trial, which also resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff, below, followed by a judgment, from which the defendant below has taken this appeal.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Vendor and purchaser, \u00a7 54*\u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain verdict. Evidence in an action for fraud and deceit in exchange of lands and for breach of warranty, examined and held to support a verdict for plaintiff.\n2. Instructions, \u00a7 18*\u2014when misleading instruction properly refused. An instruction which states a correct proposition of law is properly refused where giving it would tend to mislead the jury.\nB. K. Welsh and Brearton & Walter, for appellant.\nF. J. Stransky, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0211-01",
  "first_page_order": 259,
  "last_page_order": 260
}