{
  "id": 5378132,
  "name": "Charles Rushing, Appellant, v. O. L. Bartlett, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rushing v. Bartlett",
  "decision_date": "1915-12-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "278",
  "last_page": "278",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "197 Ill. App. 278"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 83,
    "char_count": 825,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.549,
    "sha256": "e078086df6120ea41a51e9362dc7524505f333555177732399220ff467a716fb",
    "simhash": "1:f1c807f40d3d8644",
    "word_count": 131
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:45.151974+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles Rushing, Appellant, v. O. L. Bartlett, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McBride\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McBride"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles L. Rice and Fred Hood, for appellant.",
      "Wall & Martin, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles Rushing, Appellant, v. O. L. Bartlett, Appellee.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Pulaski county; the Hon. William N. Butler, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1915.\nReversed and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed December 1, 1915.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Charles Rushing, plaintiff, against O. L. Bartlett, defendant. From a judgment sustaining the defendant\u2019s demurrer to the declaration, the plaintiff appeals.\nThe declaration and demurrer being substantially the same as those in the case of Reese v. Bartlett, ante, p. 272, and the questions made and argued the same, the opinion filed therein was adopted herein.\nCharles L. Rice and Fred Hood, for appellant.\nWall & Martin, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0278-01",
  "first_page_order": 300,
  "last_page_order": 300
}