{
  "id": 5375818,
  "name": "Lottie E. Fish, Appellee, v. William H. Fish, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Fish v. Fish",
  "decision_date": "1916-01-03",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,295",
  "first_page": "335",
  "last_page": "336",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "197 Ill. App. 335"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "194 Ill. App. 521",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2876760
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/194/0521-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1777,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15856426378526314
    },
    "sha256": "2d570b4f3f214cb796c8009595af5c456dd913eb8ae42685543da976e178593f",
    "simhash": "1:8d6683343e3d8051",
    "word_count": 307
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:45.151974+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Lottie E. Fish, Appellee, v. William H. Fish, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William H. Fish, pro se, and E. M. Seymour, for appellant.",
      "Fred A. Bangs, for appellee; Bichard H. Colby, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Lottie E. Fish, Appellee, v. William H. Fish, Appellant.\nGen. No. 21,295.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles M. Walker, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 3, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAppeal by the defendant, William H. Fish, from a decretal order entered November 21, 1914, adjudging 'hifn guilty of contempt in failing to pay to complainant $228, the amount of alimony decreed to her July 10, 1910, at the rate of $12 per month from March, 1913. By a former order entered October 10, 1913, defendant was adjudged guilty of contempt in failing to pay the alimony decreed to complainant up to and including March, 1913. From that order he prosecuted a writ of error to the Appellate Court and the order was affirmed October 5, 1915. See Fish v. Fish, 194 Ill. App. 521.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Judgment, \u00a7 648*\u2014when judgment not merged in bond. A judgment adjudging one guilty of contempt in failing to pay alimony decreed to complainant is not merged in the bond filed thereunder, nor is the debt thereby satisfied.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 709 \u2014when issue of writ of error does not stop further proceeding. The fact that a writ of error has been issued in a proceeding to adjudge defendant guilty of contempt in failing to pay alimony, and has been made a supersedeas, does not prevent complainant from further proceeding to collect subsequently accruing instalments of alimony.\nWilliam H. Fish, pro se, and E. M. Seymour, for appellant.\nFred A. Bangs, for appellee; Bichard H. Colby, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0335-01",
  "first_page_order": 357,
  "last_page_order": 358
}