{
  "id": 5377141,
  "name": "Albert Moses, Defendant in Error, v. Lazar Jacobsohn, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Moses v. Jacobsohn",
  "decision_date": "1916-01-11",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,069",
  "first_page": "413",
  "last_page": "414",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "197 Ill. App. 413"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1486,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "sha256": "f83038e28c73cd3d01d1b9dde9ef0ceacbffbf117cd94cee023b5ca9bb21a63c",
    "simhash": "1:cb598c9d51a746ce",
    "word_count": 244
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:45.151974+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Albert Moses, Defendant in Error, v. Lazar Jacobsohn, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William M. Lawton and H. C. Lindsey, for plaintiff in error; Maxwell R. Herman, of counsel.",
      "Samuels & Samuels, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Albert Moses, Defendant in Error, v. Lazar Jacobsohn, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,069.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago;. the Hon, John K. Prindiville, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinon filed January 11, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAlbert Moses, plaintiff, brought an attachment suit against Lazar Jacobsohn, defendant, on the ground that defendant was a nonresident of the State and owed plaintiff a sum of money. The defendant put in a general appearance. On judgment for the plaintiff for damages and costs, the defendant brings error.\nWilliam M. Lawton and H. C. Lindsey, for plaintiff in error; Maxwell R. Herman, of counsel.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAppeal and error, \u00a7 1301\u2014 when presumed trial court heard evidence to support judgment. Where in an attachment suit the record shows that the trial court heard evidence and found against the defendant both as to the attachment and the merits of the action, but entered judgment on the main issues only the reviewing court will, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, presume that the trial court heard sufficient evidence to support the judgment, and it is immaterial whether any judgment was entered on the attachment issue.\nSamuels & Samuels, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0413-01",
  "first_page_order": 435,
  "last_page_order": 436
}