{
  "id": 5378722,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Orrin J. Shafer, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People of State of Illinois v. Shafer",
  "decision_date": "1916-01-11",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,249",
  "first_page": "420",
  "last_page": "421",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "197 Ill. App. 420"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 184,
    "char_count": 2179,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.556,
    "sha256": "ba987d6745b158c307768bd880608f31146f959810baa45fba6cbb36265652f9",
    "simhash": "1:8f22db51dd3b2a7d",
    "word_count": 383
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:45.151974+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Orrin J. Shafer, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jonas & Hess, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Maclay Hoyne, for defendant in error; Edward E. Wilson, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Orrin J. Shafer, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,249.\n(Not to be reported in full.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edward T. Wade, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the March term, 1915.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed January 11, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nProsecution by the People of the State of Illinois against Orrin J. Shafer for violation of section 10 of the Motor Vehicle Act (J. & A. (f 10,010). Having been convicted on trial before the court without a jury, the defendant brings error.\nThe principal issue of fact raised at the hearing was as to the speed at which the defendant was driving an automobile in a locality where speed in excess of fifteen miles an hour was by statute made prima facie' evidence of its violation. After the single witness produced by the State had testified that the car was going at twenty-five miles per hour, and the defendant had testified that he was not driving faster than twelve miles an hour, that his car went about fifteen feet after he started to stop, and that he could stop it within that distance when running twelve miles an hour, the trial judge announced that it was unnecessary for him to hear any more evidence, that from his own experience in driving a car he could not accept the defendant\u2019s testimony as to speed, and refused the request of the defendant\u2019s counsel, to call other witnesses.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Trial, \u00a7 34 \u2014when refusal to allow production of witnesses denial of justice. To deny a defendant in a trial before the court his manifest right to produce witnesses to support his plea of not guilty is a palpable denial of justice.\n2. Trial, \u00a7 286 \u2014when disregard of evidence by trial judge denial of justice. For a judge to decide the issues before him on his private experience instead of on the evidence is a palpable denial of justice.\nJonas & Hess, for plaintiff in error.\nMaclay Hoyne, for defendant in error; Edward E. Wilson, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0420-01",
  "first_page_order": 442,
  "last_page_order": 443
}