{
  "id": 5374695,
  "name": "Herbert F. Brandenberg, Defendant in Error, v. Peter Klehr, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Brandenberg v. Klehr",
  "decision_date": "1916-01-17",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,486",
  "first_page": "459",
  "last_page": "460",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "197 Ill. App. 459"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 137,
    "char_count": 1998,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.559,
    "sha256": "4e382b9f76305f37d2554bd6d148a7858d9fc6a1bc8d5a0430219887eec44ad8",
    "simhash": "1:1bc7c22fe32680d8",
    "word_count": 311
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:45.151974+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Herbert F. Brandenberg, Defendant in Error, v. Peter Klehr, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Walter A. Brendecke, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Schnaekenbebg & Rubinkam, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Herbert F. Brandenberg, Defendant in Error, v. Peter Klehr, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,486.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Automobiles and garages, \u00a7 3 \u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain finding of lack of contributory negligence. In an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a collision between his motorcycle and defendant\u2019s automobile, evidence examined and held to warrant a finding that plaintiff was not guilty of negligence contributing to his injury, it appearing that at the time of the accident plaintiff was riding on the right side of the road.\n2. Automobiles and garages, \u00a7 3 \u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain finding of negligence in operation of automobile. In an action to recover for personal injuries sustained in a collision he-tween plaintiffs motorcycle and defendant's automobile, evidence examined and held sufficient to warrant a finding that defendant was guilty of negligence, it appearing that while plaintiff was riding on his right-hand side of the road, defendant improperly crossed from his right-hand side to his left, causing the collision.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John C. Work, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 17, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Herbert F. Brandenberg, plaintiff, against Peter Klehr, defendant, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a collision between plaintiff\u2019s motorcycle and defendant\u2019s automobile. The case was tried by the court without a jury. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff for four hundred and fifty dollars, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nWalter A. Brendecke, for plaintiff in error.\nSchnaekenbebg & Rubinkam, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0459-01",
  "first_page_order": 481,
  "last_page_order": 482
}