{
  "id": 5377317,
  "name": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Henry Jacobi, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of Chicago v. Jacobi",
  "decision_date": "1916-01-17",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,510",
  "first_page": "493",
  "last_page": "494",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "197 Ill. App. 493"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 166,
    "char_count": 2242,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.571,
    "sha256": "55f2405026bcd8a52e707247888b49e776f1a535cd72165f886a7cd0a6c6f6b4",
    "simhash": "1:2719d81671460488",
    "word_count": 391
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:45.151974+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Henry Jacobi, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 822 \u2014when rulings on motions must he preserved in hill of exceptions. In order to preserve for review the rulings of the trial court on motions, the evidence of such rulings must be preserved in a bill of exceptions, and it is not sufficient that the rulings are copied into the statutory record.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 824 \u2014when exceptions to rulings of trial court not part of record. Exceptions to the rulings of the trial court which appear in the record but are not preserved by the bill of exceptions are not a part of the record, and the errors assigned thereon cannot be considered on review.\n3. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 28 \u2014how rulings on petition for change of venue must he preserved for review. The rulings of the Municipal Court on a petition for a change of venue are not before the Appellate Court unless the petition and rulings thereon appear either by a bill of exceptions, stenographic report or a statement of facts as provided by section 23 of the Municipal Court Act (J. & A. H 3335).\n4. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1751 \u2014when judgment affirmed on writ of error. On a writ of error where the questions sought to be presented are not preserved in such manner that they can be reviewed by the Appellate Court, the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Cantwell & Smith, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Samuel A. Ettelson and Harry B. Miller, for defendant in error; Daniel Webster, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Henry Jacobi, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,510.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John A. Mahoney, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 17, 1916.\nStatement of the Case..\nProsecution by the City of Chicago against Henry Jacobi, defendant, charging defendant with a violation of. section 2012 of the Revised Municipal Code of Chicago. To reverse a judgment of conviction entered on a verdict of guilty, with a fine of two hundred dollars, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nCantwell & Smith, for plaintiff in error.\nSamuel A. Ettelson and Harry B. Miller, for defendant in error; Daniel Webster, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0493-01",
  "first_page_order": 515,
  "last_page_order": 516
}