{
  "id": 5375141,
  "name": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. F. S. Richardson, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of Chicago v. Richardson",
  "decision_date": "1916-01-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,756",
  "first_page": "594",
  "last_page": "595",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "197 Ill. App. 594"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 150,
    "char_count": 2356,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.537,
    "sha256": "6715887d6822c35de944e1dbe50a4ec94d440dbbe1ac332418a315841dbda427",
    "simhash": "1:1b554ea151a82078",
    "word_count": 379
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:45.151974+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. F. S. Richardson, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Benjamin E. Cohen, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Samuel A. Ettelson and Harry B. Miller, for defendant in error; Daniel Webster, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "City of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. F. S. Richardson, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21,756.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Rufus F. Robinson, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 31, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nProsecution by the City of Chicago against F. S. Bichareis on, defendant, in the Municipal Court of Chicago, charging defendant with a violation of section 2019 of the Chicago Code. The case was tried by the court without a jury. To reverse a judgment of conviction with a fine of two hundred dollars, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nBenjamin E. Cohen, for plaintiff in error.\nSamuel A. Ettelson and Harry B. Miller, for defendant in error; Daniel Webster, of counsel.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 39 \u2014when ordinance must Toe incorporated in stenographic report for purpose of review. A defendant in a prosecution charging him with violating an ordinance of the City of Chicago, who desires to preserve for review the question whether a judgment of conviction is supported by the evidence, must cause-the ordinance to be incorporated in the stenographic report.\n2. Disorderly house, \u00a7 2 \u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain finding as to keeping of disorderly house. In a prosecution charging defendant with keeping a disorderly house in violation of a city ordinance, evidence held to justify a finding that defendant\u2019s place was a disorderly house as charged in the complaint.\n3. Disorderly house, \u00a7 2 \u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain finding that defendant knew character of place. In a prosecution charging defendant with keeping a disorderly house in violation of a city ordinance, the probative force of evidence as to the character of defendant\u2019s place will also justify the conclusion that defendant knew its character.\n4. Disorderly house, \u00a7 2 \u2014when evidence sufficient to identify premises named in complaint. In a prosecution charging defendant with keeping a disorderly house in violation of a city ordinance, evidence held sufficient to identify defendant\u2019s premises with the premises named in the complaint.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0594-01",
  "first_page_order": 616,
  "last_page_order": 617
}