{
  "id": 2856662,
  "name": "Pauline Ehrhardt, Appellee, v. George M. Ehrhardt, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ehrhardt v. Ehrhardt",
  "decision_date": "1916-02-14",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,856",
  "first_page": "47",
  "last_page": "48",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "198 Ill. App. 47"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1622,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.549,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.317852702137001e-08,
      "percentile": 0.43716081516721633
    },
    "sha256": "e76f3035936906cf26c1d4b687d204511ae552579ae3c2de6bf93ccb8b286593",
    "simhash": "1:6552feb4d02dbad0",
    "word_count": 275
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:11:33.440984+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Pauline Ehrhardt, Appellee, v. George M. Ehrhardt, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William B. Berger and Alvin E. Stein, for appellant.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Pauline Ehrhardt, Appellee, v. George M. Ehrhardt, Appellant.\nGen. No. 21,856.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1915.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed February 14, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nPauline Ehrhardt filed her bill for divorce against George M. Ehrhardt and he filed a cross-bill against her. June 25, 1914, both bill and cross-bill were dismissed for want of equity, and the same day an order was entered that the defendant pay to complainant $108 on account of her solicitor\u2019s fees in the case. An order was entered commanding defendant to show cause why he should not be attached for contempt in. failing to pay complainant $108 solicitor\u2019s fees, and on hearing of the rule April 12, 1915, defendant was adjudged guilty of contempt and an order entered that he be attached and confined in the county jail until he pay such solicitor\u2019s fees, but not exceeding six months.\nFrom that order this appeal is prosecuted by the defendant.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nDivobce, \u00a7 135 \u2014when order to pay solicitor\u2019s fees improper. Where a wife\u2019s bill for divorce is dismissed for want of equity, the court has no authority to order defendant to pay complainant solicitor\u2019s fees, and a commitment for contempt for failure to pay such fee will not be allowed to stand.\nWilliam B. Berger and Alvin E. Stein, for appellant.\nNo appearance for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0047-01",
  "first_page_order": 71,
  "last_page_order": 72
}