{
  "id": 2862058,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Emil Schmutz, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Schmutz",
  "decision_date": "1916-02-16",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21, 617",
  "first_page": "108",
  "last_page": "109",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "198 Ill. App. 108"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 170,
    "char_count": 1895,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.564,
    "sha256": "915d58f152a707a8a4402e2b9442b3db336ebb748df75cf45a93ac42d1f059f3",
    "simhash": "1:8837ce11b88fa09c",
    "word_count": 323
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:11:33.440984+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Emil Schmutz, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Goodwin\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Husband and wife, \u00a7 273 \u2014when husband not guilty of wife desertion. Where a man remarries in another State within less than one year of the date of the divorce from his former wife, and deserts his second wife, he cannot he convicted of wife desertion, as such second marriage is illegal,",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Goodwin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Pringle & Fearing, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Maclay Hoyne, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Emil Schmutz, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 21, 617.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Divorce, \u00a7 172 \u2014when divorced person may not remarry. Under the Act of May 13, 1905 (J. & A. H 4216), concerning the marriage of divorced persons, a man who marries another woman in another State within less than one year after his divorce from his first wife does not contract a valid marriage in such State.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry M: Fisheb, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed February 16, 1916.\nRehearing denied March 1, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by the People of the State of Illinois against Emil Schmutz, defendant, based on an information charging that he wrongfully and unlawfully abandoned his wife, Matilda Schmutz. To reverse judgment for the People, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nAt the hearing it appeared that defendant had previously been married to one Iva May Meyers, who \"was granted a divorce from him June 5, 1905, in the Superior Court of Cook county, and that he married the complaining witness in this case April 21, 1906, at Crown Point, Indiana.\nPringle & Fearing, for plaintiff in error.\nMaclay Hoyne, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0108-01",
  "first_page_order": 132,
  "last_page_order": 133
}