{
  "id": 2858776,
  "name": "Fred Miller Brewing Company, Appellee, v. G. Heileman Brewing Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Fred Miller Brewing Co. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co.",
  "decision_date": "1916-03-07",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,835",
  "first_page": "178",
  "last_page": "180",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "198 Ill. App. 178"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 230,
    "char_count": 3373,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.531,
    "sha256": "cdd2afe4a494c80e440936697fa38f588d53fcd94065dcb3d0f7a06427f3a906",
    "simhash": "1:094cc1256045dc1c",
    "word_count": 553
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:11:33.440984+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Fred Miller Brewing Company, Appellee, v. G. Heileman Brewing Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wilkerson, Cassels & Potter, for appellant; Edwin H. Cassels and Kenneth B. Hawkins, of counsel.",
      "Winston, Payne, Strawn & Shaw, for appellee; Arthur C. Marriott, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Fred Miller Brewing Company, Appellee, v. G. Heileman Brewing Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 21,835.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles A. Williams, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 7, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Fred Miller Brewing Company, plaintiff, against G. Heileman Brewing Company, defendant, for the purchase price of saloon fixtures. From a judgment for $1,500 for plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nPlaintiff was lessee of premises at No. 2109 Wabash avenue and the owner of saloon and restaurant fixtures therein. In March, 1912, representatives of plaintiff had a conversation with Walter G. Mueller, who was manager of the Chicago branch of the defendant company, whose main office was in Wisconsin, at which time the saloon business was not conducted in these premises because the saloon license had been revoked. During this conversation it was agreed between these representatives of the respective breweries that the defendant would purchase from the plaintiff the fixtures and furniture contained in the premises and also the lease, which would be assigned to the defendant, but that the $1,500 purchase price would not be paid until Mr. Mueller was sure the license would be restored. The lease was dated January 20, 1912, and ran to the plaintiff as lessee, and at this time, by apt words in writing, the lease was assigned from plaintiff to defendant, the defendant signing \u2018\u2018Gr. Heileman Brewing Company (Seal), by Walter C. Mueller.\u201d The landlord consented to this assignment. At the same time, - by another writing signed by the respective parties in the same manner, it was agreed that the furniture in the saloon should be sold by the plaintiff to the defendant, the defendant agreeing to pay therefor the sum of $1,500 as soon as a saloon license should issue from the City of Chicago for the operation of a saloon on said premises. Later on this license was issued, and on June 13, 1912, the saloon business was resumed.\nDefendant entered into possession of the premises and furniture, and paid rent under the lease from and including June, 1912, until the expiration of the lease on April 30, 1913. It used the furniture in question during all of this time, and never offered to return the same or to reassign the lease. After the license was issued request was made of defendant to pay the $1,500, which was refused by the defendant.\nWilkerson, Cassels & Potter, for appellant; Edwin H. Cassels and Kenneth B. Hawkins, of counsel.\nWinston, Payne, Strawn & Shaw, for appellee; Arthur C. Marriott, of counsel.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nCorporations, \u00a7 384 \u2014when taking of assignment of lease deemed ratified. Although the representative of a brewing company may not have had authority to take assignment of lease of saloon premises and to purchase the fixtures therein, in the first instance, the company must be held to have ratified the agreement where it had knowledge thereof, and, while protesting as to the price, nevertheless continued to hold possession of the fixtures and leased premises and never offered to return the furniture to the lessee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0178-01",
  "first_page_order": 202,
  "last_page_order": 204
}