{
  "id": 2861644,
  "name": "Augusta Albrecht et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Joseph Pinger et al., Defendants in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Albrecht v. Pinger",
  "decision_date": "1916-03-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,202",
  "first_page": "257",
  "last_page": "257",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "198 Ill. App. 257"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1386,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.562,
    "sha256": "449eed8d6084f833807708f90ce085cc9d52abbf910ee235e0f5f90fe19d9cad",
    "simhash": "1:df7dda139e2f63a2",
    "word_count": 228
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:11:33.440984+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Augusta Albrecht et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Joseph Pinger et al., Defendants in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "I. W. Foltz and William C. Dunn, for plaintiffs in error.",
      "Day & Guenther, W. H. Nelms and F. P. Drennan, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Augusta Albrecht et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Joseph Pinger et al., Defendants in Error.\nGen. No. 21,202.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAppeal and ebbob, \u00a7 1186 \u2014when question of applicability of instructions uAll not be reviewed. Under a record which consists of mere abstract questions of law and which contains neither evidence nor a certificate of the trial judge as to what it tended to prove, nor anything to determine the applicability of instructions complained of, the Appellate Court will not be justified in reviewing the case unless they can determine, that the instructions are vicious under any and all circumstances.\nError to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles H. Bowles, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 9, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction under Dramshop Act (Hurd\u2019s Rev. St., eh. 43, J. & A. 4600 et seq.), brought by Augusta Albrecht and others, plaintiffs, against Joseph Pinger, and others, defendants. From a judgment against them, plaintiffs bring error.\nI. W. Foltz and William C. Dunn, for plaintiffs in error.\nDay & Guenther, W. H. Nelms and F. P. Drennan, for defendants in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0257-01",
  "first_page_order": 281,
  "last_page_order": 281
}