{
  "id": 2861136,
  "name": "August Leroy, Plaintiff in Error, v. Minerva V. Scott, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Leroy v. Scott",
  "decision_date": "1916-04-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,632",
  "first_page": "491",
  "last_page": "492",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "198 Ill. App. 491"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 160,
    "char_count": 1916,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.556,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3552960037438476
    },
    "sha256": "d32c9953612b03078d6bf731149b7b6bcbb3d92a666fad363c11a72ec61c85e2",
    "simhash": "1:c75d47a49c8fa69c",
    "word_count": 329
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:11:33.440984+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "August Leroy, Plaintiff in Error, v. Minerva V. Scott, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robert H. Holmes, for plaintiff in error.",
      "No appearance for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "August Leroy, Plaintiff in Error, v. Minerva V. Scott, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 21,632.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John H. Fornoff, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 10, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by August Leroy, plaintiff, against Minerva V. Scott, defendant.\nIt is stated in the abstract that the declaration is in an \u2018 \u2018 action of debt on a foreign judgment laying damages $79.50.\u201d- It appears that a judgment by default was entered and then set aside; that pleas of nil debet and of nul tiel record were subsequently filed; that a replication to the plea of nul tiel record, concluding with a verification, was filed, and that an ore tenus demurrer to the plea of nil debet was sustained. Then follows the judgment of nil capiat, which recites that submission of the cause for trial by the court was pursuant to the stipulation of the parties. Subsequent to the entry of the judgment, defendant filed, by leave of court, a plea of puis darrein continuance. No issue was joined on this plea. Plaintiff then moved to vacate the judgment, and the motion being overruled brings error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAppeal and error, \u00a7 892 \u2014when judgment affirmed where abstract insufficient. The abstract of the record is the pleading of the plaintiff in error beyond which a court of review will not look for grounds of reversal, and the judgment will be affirmed where the abstract is practically nothing more than an index of the record, and fails to show any error of procedure or in the pleadings, even though it is accompanied by a full transcript.\nRobert H. Holmes, for plaintiff in error.\nNo appearance for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0491-01",
  "first_page_order": 515,
  "last_page_order": 516
}