{
  "id": 2860074,
  "name": "Anton Papszycki, Defendant in Error, v. John Gurka, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Papszycki v. Gurka",
  "decision_date": "1916-04-12",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 19,494",
  "first_page": "507",
  "last_page": "508",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "198 Ill. App. 507"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 164,
    "char_count": 2107,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.579,
    "sha256": "6c8c012dc53edae766a983d6b95e4181757ebd29bdf334229c21ea62e15364df",
    "simhash": "1:0930c1f3f59f04bc",
    "word_count": 357
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:11:33.440984+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Anton Papszycki, Defendant in Error, v. John Gurka, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Pam\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n3. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 1313 \u2014when presumed that case tried on regular call of calendar. Where nothing to the contrary appears in the record, it will be presumed that a case is tried on the regular call of the calendar.\n4. Damages, \u00a7 228*\u2014when notice to defendant after default not prerequisite to holding inquest to assess damages. Where a default is entered in an action tried on the regular call of the calendar, notice to the defendant after such default is not necessary to enable the court to hold an inquest for assessing damages.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Pam"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. G. Anderson and E. H. Wright, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Chytraus, Healy & Frost, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Anton Papszycki, Defendant in Error, v. John Gurka, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 19,494.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Animals, \u00a7 14 \u2014when persons not bound to exercise care to avoid being bitten by domestic animals. Persons are not hound to exercise care to avoid being injured by domestic animals not naturally dangerous without notice of the vicious tendencies of the particular animal.\n2. Animals, \u00a7 39*\u2014when plaintiff need not allege and prove due care to avoid injury -from animal. In an action to recover damages for being bitten by a dog, it is not necessary for plaintiff to aver and prove due care and caution for his own protection, such facts being matter of defense.\nError to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at. the March term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 12, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Anton Papszycki, plaintiff, against John Gurka, defendant, in the Superior Court of Cook county, to recover damages for being bitten by defendant\u2019s dog. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff for eight hundred and fifty dollars, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nW. G. Anderson and E. H. Wright, for plaintiff in error.\nChytraus, Healy & Frost, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to. XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0507-01",
  "first_page_order": 531,
  "last_page_order": 532
}