{
  "id": 2969438,
  "name": "Anderson & Lind Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. Carpenters' District Council of Chicago et al., Defendants. John Metz et al., Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Anderson & Lind Manufacturing Co. v. Carpenters' District Council",
  "decision_date": "1916-04-28",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 20,809",
  "first_page": "330",
  "last_page": "331",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "199 Ill. App. 330"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 207,
    "char_count": 2766,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.576,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.6922169990516086e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2943194757686645
    },
    "sha256": "f3589ec5b99c96ddff07d53454b72e3b82118110e8770140945b1448d1d66b69",
    "simhash": "1:56120b81406a8471",
    "word_count": 428
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:51:30.955611+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Anderson & Lind Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. Carpenters\u2019 District Council of Chicago et al., Defendants. John Metz et al., Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McGoorty\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McGoorty"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Edmund W. Fboehlich, for appellant.",
      "Fabkeil & Thompson, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Anderson & Lind Manufacturing Company, Appellant, v. Carpenters\u2019 District Council of Chicago et al., Defendants. John Metz et al., Appellees.\nGen. No. 20,809.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oscar E. Heard, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1914.\nAffirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed April 28, 1916.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill in equity by the Anderson & Lind Manufacturing Company, complainant, against the United Brqtherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, the Carpenters\u2019 District of Chicago, and a number of their officers, agents and members, defendants, charging them with conspiring to compel and 'coerce complainant to unionize or organize its shop, and to establish and maintain, in order to aid them in securing such result, an illegal boycott against complainant and the product of its mill.\nThis is an appeal to reverse that part of the decree entered in this case which directs the dissolution of a temporary injunction, and the dismissal of complainant\u2019s amended bill of complaint as to John Metz, Daniel Galvin, Abe Weinstein, Joseph Morava, Oscar Olson, Alex Jeschke and the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America. The decree makes perpetual such temporary injunction as to the other defendants, in whose behalf no appeal has been perfected by any party in interest.\nEdmund W. Fboehlich, for appellant.\nFabkeil & Thompson, for appellees.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Conspiracy, \u00a7 16 \u2014when temporary injunction properly dissolved. On a bill to enjoin a national organization, its local subordinate bodies and certain officers and agents of the latter from unlawfully injuring complainant\u2019s business, a temporary injunction against the national organization will be dissolved where there is nothing to show that any wrongful acts were ratified or authorized by the national organization.\n2. Conspiracy, \u00a7 16*\u2014when temporary injunction against interference with business properly made permanent. On a bill to enjoin a national organization, its local subordinate agencies and the agents and officers of the latter from conspiring to interfere with the complainant\u2019s business by threats, intimidation, boycott and similar illegal acts, a temporary injunction against such officers and agents should be made permanent as to such of the officers and agents as participated in the illegal acts, but not against an agent who merely stated to a witness that complainant should unionize its shop, without any threat or intimidation on his part.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0330-01",
  "first_page_order": 352,
  "last_page_order": 353
}